Claudio De Genua
Author

Claudio De Genua

Archivist · Curator

BSc in Environmental Sciences — Sapienza University of Rome (2013)

Auditor LL-C Certification Italia | ISO 9001 · 14001 · 50001 · 45001 (since 2019)

Founder and principal author of TeoCentro.

Research methodology and quality standards: how we write at TeoCentro →

About

Claudio De Genua founded TeoCentro with a precise objective: to preserve the Jewish-Christian theological tradition in its primary sources — Torah, Tanakh, Mishnah, Talmud, patristic literature — and to make it transmissible: accessible, verifiable, ergonomic, complete.

His training as a systems auditor (BSc Environmental Sciences — La Sapienza 2013; LL-C Auditor ISO 9001/14001/50001/45001 since 2019) provided the method: source traceability, verification of documentary chains, detectable non-conformities. Tools born for quality management, applied to the custodianship of a millennial textual corpus.

His work as a film dubbing adapter (SIAE registered) refined the discipline of textual fidelity under formal constraints: preserving the meaning of the source while respecting the medium's limitations. A direct competence applied to the translation and adaptation of primary theological sources.

Research Areas

HalakhahJewish law through Mishnah and Talmud Bavli and Yerushalmi
Systematic TheologyStructures of revelation in the Tanakh and continuity in the New Testament
Jewish-Christian World of the First CenturiesTannaim traditions, early patristic literature, continuity between Second Temple Judaism and the ecclesia
Source CriticismAnalysis and verification of biblical and rabbinic primary sources

Methodological Approach

Claudio De Genua's research develops within the exegetical approach of Prof. Walter Binni — scholar of biblical textual transmission and source criticism.

The method that follows is not the verification of isolated individual claims, but the legitimate reconstruction of meaning from the available documentary evidence: the convergence of sources, the stratification of traditions, the internal coherence of the corpus. An interpretation holds insofar as it can be reconstructed from the documentation — not insofar as it appears plausible.